| Developed from the DHC-4 Caribou, being an enlarged fuselage version of that aircraft, the de Havilland Canada DHC-5 Buffalo was known originally as the Caribou II. Four were ordered for evaluation by the US Army, their development cost shared by the US Army, together with the Canadian government and de Havilland Canada; the first of these transports made its maiden flight on 9 April 1964. The DHC-5 had been developed to meet the requirements of the US Army for a transport that would be able to carry loads such as the Pershing missile, a 105-mm howitzer or 3/4-ton truck.
No further orders resulted from US Army evaluation of the DHC-5 (designated originally YAC-2 by the US Army, and later C-8A), but the Canadian Armed Forces acquired 15 of the DHC-5A which it designated CC-115: six were converted subsequently for deployment in a maritime patrol role. Following delivery of 24 to the Brazilian air force and 16 to the Peruvian air force, the production line was closed down. In 1974 the company realised there was a continuing demand for the Buffalo and production of an improved DHC-5D Buffalo was initiated. This had more powerful engines which permitted operation at higher gross weights, and offered improved all-round performance. Production of the Buffalo ended in 1982, but the last of 122 aircraft built was not delivered until April 1985. DHC-5Ds were bought by the armed forces of Abu Dhabi (5), Cameroun (3), Chile (1), Ecuador (3), Egypt (10), Kenya (8), Mauritania (1), Mexico (3), Sudan (4), Tanzania (6), Togo (2), Zaire (3) and Zambia (7). With some interest being shown by civil operators, DH Canada developed the DHC-5E Transporter, certificated in Canada in 1981. Generally similar to the military Buffalo, it could seat 44 passengers in a standard layout but with quick-change passenger/cargo and VIP/executive interior. Two were acquired by Ethiopian Airlines.
VARIANTS
DHC-5B: designation of proposed version with General Electric CT64-P4C engines, not built.
DHC-5C: designation of proposed version with Rolls-Royce Dart RDa.12 engines, not built.
NASA/DITC XC-8A: designation of C-8A following conversion for use as an augmentor wing research aircraft; extensively modified, it has clipped wings, fixed landing gear, two Rolls-Royce Spey engines with vectored nozzles complementing the augmentor wings.
XC-8A ACLS: redesignation of C-8A following conversion for use as an Air-Cushion Landing System research aircraft; instead of conventional landing gear it has an inflatable but perforated rubber air cushion which permits operation from and to almost any type of surface, including ice, rough airfields, soft soils, snow, swamps and water.
NASA/Boeing QSRA: redesignation of C-8A following conversion for use as a Quiet Short-haul Research Aircraft; this aircraft has a new wing incorporating upper-surface blowing and boundary-layer control; engines are four Avco Lycoming F102 turbofans.
| A three-view drawing (1000 x 492) |
MODEL | DHC-5D |
CREW | 2 |
PASSENGERS | 44 |
ENGINE | 2 x General Electric CT64-820-4 turboprop, 2336kW |
WEIGHTS |
Take-off weight | 22317 kg | 49201 lb |
Empty weight | 11412 kg | 25159 lb |
DIMENSIONS |
Wingspan | 29.26 m | 96 ft 0 in |
Length | 24.08 m | 79 ft 0 in |
Height | 8.76 m | 29 ft 9 in |
Wing area | 87.79 m2 | 944.96 sq ft |
PERFORMANCE |
Cruise speed | 420 km/h | 261 mph |
Ceiling | 7620 m | 25000 ft |
Range w/max.fuel | 3280 km | 2038 miles |
Range w/max payload | 416 km | 258 miles |
Jean-Paul, e-mail, 08.02.2010 21:28 @G I Wonder, the only 4 engine turbo-prop the canadian army has is the DASH-7, a close relative of the Buffalo and the DASH-8. reply | G I wonder, e-mail, 04.02.2010 00:25 I thought the Buffalo was a 4 engine (turbo prop) I say this because I saw one at Cold lake 1977. So what did I see then? reply | Owen Smith, e-mail, 12.01.2010 21:31 I love the Buffalo (I'm a Buffalo buff :P) and would like to create a model of it for the FlightGear flight simulator. 3-view drawings are nice but can anyone get their hands on more detailed drawings with fuselage and wing x-sections? reply | R Hull, e-mail, 07.12.2009 02:27 A good design aircraft that Canadians can be proud of and the that Viking aircraft of Victoria has been trying to get the Canadian government to commit to buying again at approximately 1 /2 the cost of replacing with the proposed C-27 spartan. but the Canadian government seems bound and determined to never let Canada have an aerospace industry again after it killed the avro arrow reply |
| Sky Relief, e-mail, 19.05.2009 18:57 Serial number 007 and 009 are still flying well ... reply | Colin Olsen, e-mail, 09.01.2009 18:30 For Rick Lund......read between the lines....it's a government thing to confuse you....hehehe
For everyone else, yes I do believe a model was made, but one will have to look in some fairly esoteric places to find it.
I spent 15 years as an Instrument Electrician working on the Buff in 442 Sqn in Comox, and better SAR platform will never be found.
The old Doppler AATC has been removed in favour of on-board GPS now. The old frequency converter system has been replaced by a set of four static inverters for a more stable, cleaner 115 VAC 400 Hz power.
The problems with the FCU's and right angle drives on te T-64 engines have been resolved allowig for that much more reliablility.
In about 1993 /94, CC115, 115465, ran off the end of the runway and tore up the nose some. Filed Aviation West in Calgary removed the original forward fuselage section and installed the forward fuselage section from teh Farnborough Buffalo.
In 1999 /2000, 465 had another incident where one of the propeller overspeed switches failed and the engine exploded while conducting a post FCU change ground run.
The aircraft was rebuilt within 14 months by Canadian military aviation technicians, and flew her first post rebuild test flight serviceable, with the exception of one of the nacelle doors blowing off inflight due to a faulty hinge and latch.
There are currently six CC115 Buffalos in CF service, 115451, 452,456, 456, 462, and finally 465. All six are serving with 442 Sqn in Comox, British Columbia, Canada. reply | john young, e-mail, 29.05.2008 11:49 Was there ever any models made of the Buffalo. I flew it for 5 years. reply | Rick Lund, e-mail, 31.01.2008 04:14 Why would you make the wingspan 95 Ft 12 in? In Canada we would say 96 ft. reply | e.kiboro, e-mail, 15.10.2007 19:05 please contact me reply |
Do you have any comments?
|
| COMPANY PROFILE All the World's Rotorcraft
|