North American XB-70 Valkyrie

1964

Back to the Virtual Aircraft Museum
  BOMBERVirtual Aircraft Museum / USA / North American  

North American XB-70 Valkyrie

Developed to USAF General Operational Requirement 38 for an intercontinental bomber to replace the Boeing B-52, the Mach 3 North American XB-70A was the subject of an order for three prototypes, awarded on 4 October 1961, although the third was later cancelled. A delta-winged canard design, with wing tips which folded down at 65° to the horizontal to provide improved supersonic stability, and powered by six 13608kg thrust General Electric J93-GE-3 engines, the first prototype was flown by Alvin S. White and Colonel Joseph F. Cotton on 21 September 1964; it first achieved its design speed of Mach 3 on 14 October 1965. The improved second prototype flew on 17 July 1965, but was lost in a mid-air collision on 8 June 1966. The surviving aircraft carried out a number of test programmes, including work in connection with the US supersonic transport programme, but on 4 February 1969 it was flown to retirement at the US Air Force Museum, Wright Patterson AFB, Dayton, Ohio.

FACTS AND FIGURES

© The Valkyrie's wingtips lowered to trap the shockwave under the fuselage and create 'compression lift', allowing operation at nearly 24,320m.

© Company brochures claimed a B-70 could take off from the western US and intercept Chinese invaders approaching Taiwan before they were halfway across. The Valkyrie was not an interceptor, nor had it any anti-shipping capability.

© The crew's seats became enclosed in individual escape capsules in an emergency. In the XB-70 crash, only one capsule functioned correctly.

© Most of the XB-70 was made of a new type of stainless steel. The different grades of metal used caused electrolytic corrosion.

North American XB-70 Valkyrie on YOUTUBE

North American XB-70 Valkyrie

Specification 
 CREW2
 ENGINE6 x General Electric J93-GE-3, 13608kg
 WEIGHTS
  Take-off weight249476 kg550003 lb
 DIMENSIONS
  Wingspan32.0 m105 ft 0 in
  Length59.75 m196 ft 0 in
  Height9.1 m30 ft 10 in
  Wing area565.0 m26081.60 sq ft
 PERFORMANCE
  Max. speed3218 km/h2000 mph
  Ceiling21336 m70000 ft
  Range w/max.fuel12000 km7457 miles

Comments1-20 21-40 41-60
Greg Newkold, e-mail, 24.01.2011 23:34

As a elementary school kid I watched the planes land at Wright Patterson. Awesome having planes land with parachutes. I have a picture of my self as a child standing next to the plane while it was still outside. I now work on the 787.

reply

Douglas Hayman, e-mail, 19.01.2011 09:45

I worked in planning on the XB-70, one of the things that always amazed me on the mock-up at LA facility was a man could stand up in the air intakes. The fuselage & wings were made of 15-7 MO brazed honeycomb panels. When I later transferred to engineering, I took over drafting board that had layout drawing for a zero launch platform for the XB-70, didn't look real practical, but was very detailed.

reply

Gerry Keffer, e-mail, 07.01.2011 02:02

I remember seeing it on the news and like I said, it sure looked like the other aircraft hit the XB-70. Why elso would it suddenly 'burst into flames?'

reply

Gerry Keffer, e-mail, 07.01.2011 01:58

My bad guys. It was the space shuttle I saw at Edwards. I saw the XB-70 at Wright-Pat AFB, OH.

reply

Gerry Keffer, e-mail, 07.01.2011 01:56

This aircraft was by far the most elegant looking, graceful and lethal weapon in the arsenal. I never understood why it was discontinued. As I remember it it was one of the chase planes that collided with the XB-70 causing the crash and not the other way around. The last one I ever saw was on display at an Edwards AFB air show. It was breath taking to see it and to be able to walk around it...

reply

george kamburoff, e-mail, 30.11.2010 02:24

I was a young radio tech at Edwards on June 8, 1966. I had talked Russ Henderson into letting me go along with him to participate in the launch of an X-15. To a young nerd like me, It was a great treat to be a part of it, and I could hardly believe I was really there.


They used to park the XB-70's right outside my door of the huge M&M Hangar, right before they flew them, and those birds always took by breath away. They looked different from different angles, and were a stunning aircraft. That morning, I had failed to notice that it was no longer parked outside the hangar.

After we finished checking and certifying the communications on the Mothership, I was driving us back to the radio shop, the sun just coming up across the lakebed, when somebody pulled up beside me. It was a taxiing NASA F-104N, and the pilot was waving. Russ and I waved back, and he taxied ahead of us, then turned around and took off. It was Joe Walker, and he never came back. Nor did the XB-70.

Even for a place where crashes were frequent, this one hurt. A few days later, after midnight, I came upon several large stakebed trucks parked in a dark area outside the M&M Hanger. They were gone by morning. A day or so later, I was alone in the shop, when an E-3 in office attire (1505's), came in pushing a small cart covered with heavy sheets. It was a collection of charred, flattened, remains of cockpit instruments. I identified the ARC-66 control box of an F-104, and was told that it was from Joe's aircraft.

It was a long time before our other bird came out, but I stood out as close to the runway as I could get, and watched it take off weighting 535,000 pounds, thunder slowly into the sky with all six engines in afterburner, then come back around for a very low pass over us, while the technicians looked it over, checking for panels and leaks, then, it turned and left us, to soar at Mach Three, in a large arc of several Western states.

One day in mid 1966, I looked up and saw an XB-70 with a Blackbird on its right wingtip. The base historical office says they have no photographic record of it.

They were my very favorite birds.

reply

Ryan Cross, e-mail, 19.11.2010 07:47

The XB-70 is an amazing piece of work! What was the estimated cost to build the first prototype?

reply

Bob Foster, e-mail, 18.11.2010 22:45

Watched from the Patterson flight line, the surviver land on it's final flight. The J93's put out a huge black smoke cloud but damn the aircraft was beautiful in flight!

reply

Phil Jensen, e-mail, 16.11.2010 17:39

After the XB-70 was retired, Col. Joe Cotton joined United Airlines as an engineering test pilot. In 1971 I found myself, a youngster, paired with him in B-747 transition training. During the long evenings, and after many hours in the cockpit, he shared stories of his career, getting shot down over Greece, receiving a direct presidential commission in the new U. S. Air Force from Harry Truman, testing and developing the B-58 Hustler, flying the B-52 mother ship for the X-15, and ultimately running the development program for the XB-70 with Alvin White. He talked of such things as 'unstarts'; losing a portion of the honeycomb wing at supersonic speed; and of saving the billion dollar aircraft when the nose gear became jammed against a door out of sequence: they fashioned a jumper wire from a flight plan clipboard, and Col. Cotton wiggled back into the electronics bay and shorted the brain box letting the nose gear free fall(!); then the story of the tragic mid-air collision that destroyed ship number two. In 37 years as an airline pilot, it remains the most fascinating time I can remember.

reply

Monty Barrett, e-mail, 25.10.2010 01:19

Only the Convair B-58 comes close for aesthetics. B-58, also a beautiful airplane. I have seen both in flight, unforgetable.

reply

Mike, e-mail, 07.10.2010 00:18

A beauty in it's own right... and a shame to have been abandoned. Another victim, much like the F-108 Rapier interceptor concept, of pressure on Adm. Curtis Leymay from bean-counters to choose either planes or missiles. The figuring: If we have missiles capable of getting there in just minutes... What do we need a HST-plane for?

Further irony is that it was intended as a replacement for the B-52, which at last report is said to see service until approximately 2050... Due to continuous updates of it's engines.

reply

Oneshot, e-mail, 29.04.2010 03:44

I have one of the air mail that was onbord when it went Mach 3 my father was on the program at Edwards AFB.

reply

vassilios sitaras, e-mail, 15.02.2010 01:39

I have written 2 articles about the XB-70 for the leading aviation magazines in Greece, one in 1994 and one in 1998. It is, beyond doubt, the greatest aviation achievement so far, a combination of size, weight, thrust, speed, ceiling and range which is still a class of its own. The USAF Museum should place it ASAP in their impresive Cold War hangar and not hidden back in the ...Annex, where just a very few people are able to go every day. It's a shame!

reply

John Martz, e-mail, 04.02.2010 21:26

The wing tips folded down to trap the supersonic lift by the nose shock. that is why the long distance from the tip of the nose to the wings

reply

Bill Fisher, e-mail, 13.01.2010 22:11

Has to be one of the most beautiful aircraft ever designed or built. I worked for G.E. and was told that the crash occured when they were taking promotional photos of the plane. That's a shame it wasn't continued.

reply

Bill Hofbauer, e-mail, 11.01.2010 23:38

I worked on the catll tests of the F-4E
We shared a hangar with the XB-70
One day I was invited to go down to the end of the runway
and witness the take-off of the Valkyrie right over our heads.
Unforgettable!!!!

reply

julius c jacobson, e-mail, 16.12.2009 00:11

Because of "on the cheap politics and economics" the structural bureaucrats in the senate, congress, and the D O D have set us up for the greatest fall of any superpower to historicaly yet to undergo. There was absolutely no reason why this type of supersonic bomber should have not been part of our triad attack respones S A C inventory. This plane could have been usefull in many ways. They just were too blind to see its practical attack posture! Our great nation is falling like Rome fell!

reply

Shawn P Boike, e-mail, 11.12.2009 21:45

Terrific lessons learned at a time, the US could develop faster & better than we do today. The variable wings & structure was way ahead of its time. Too bad this sits in the past like our NASP.

reply

paul scott, e-mail, 14.08.2009 00:35

Perhaps the most impressive aircraft ever built. Shame it didn't go further, like so many.

reply

Neal Masterson, e-mail, 28.01.2009 22:24

Just correcting the spelling of my name and email address.

reply

1-20 21-40 41-60

Do you have any comments?

Name    E-mail


COMPANY
PROFILE


All the World's Rotorcraft


All rhe World's Rotorcraft AVIATION TOP 100 - www.avitop.com Avitop.com