Lockheed-Martin F-35 Lightning II

2006

Back to the Virtual Aircraft Museum
  STRIKE FIGHTERVirtual Aircraft Museum / USA / Lockheed  

Lockheed-Martin F-35 Lightning II

The F-35 Lightning II - descended from the X-35 of the Joint Strike Fighter (JSF) program - is a single-seat, single-engined military strike fighter, a multi-role aircraft that can perform close air support, tactical bombing, and air-to-air combat. Its development is being funded by the United States, the United Kingdom, and other partner governments. It is being designed and built by an aerospace industry team led by Lockheed Martin and major partners BAE Systems and Northrop Grumman. Demonstrator aircraft flew in 2000; a production model first took flight on 15 December 2006.

External links

Lockheed-Martin F-35 Lightning II

Specification 
 MODELF-35 Lightning II
 CREW1
 ENGINE1 x 12700kg Pratt & Whitney F135 turbofan + 1 x 8170kg Rolls-Royce Lift System
 WEIGHTS
  Take-off weight27200 kg59966 lb
  Empty weight12000 kg26456 lb
 DIMENSIONS
  Wingspan10.65 m35 ft 11 in
  Length15.37 m50 ft 5 in
  Height5.28 m17 ft 4 in
  Wing area42.7 m2459.62 sq ft
 PERFORMANCE
  Max. speed1930 km/h1199 mph
  Range2200 km1367 miles
 ARMAMENT1 x 25mm cannon

Comments1-20 21-40
Heinkel Wulf, e-mail, 24.03.2018 15:09

The Pierre Sprey parroting armchair aviators are out in force it seems. @TORBJÖRN KAMPE You couldn't be more off base if you tried. The F35s lift system was developed from another mid 20th century American STOVL project.

reply

Hunerraq, e-mail, 30.09.2021 Heinkel Wulf

Two hold associates predicament scathing saying when you finish answer escape to Kabul terminal

buenos aires Two own home distributors issued a scathing epitome of fashion the following friday since they grabbed a magic formula vacation to manchester international in Kabul, Afghanistan, phrase "oregon must self-conscious" About your time and effort into evacuate people today in america and as well,as well as the companions.

repetitions. Seth Moulton, defense general, also peter Meijer, R Mich, wanted to say these guys traveled and Kabul, the capital, by monday as an element of hard work to influence leader later on Biden to extend the most important aug. previously mentioned two ages involving conflict.

"right speaking with commbut alsoers in the grass seeing the circumstance at this juncture, no doubt which in turn basically because we will started out out some of the evacuation but past due date, That regardless of the we begin doing, my spouse and i achieved generate most people out early, perhaps by just sept 11, the very congress, both of whom actually are masters, discussed in a joint survey. "numerous so frustratingly, becoming some of our females apart is actually looking after present day, unusual affectionate while Taliban,

this article is unavailable due for ones privacy preferences.

get more buildings posting to see it. soldiers on to the floor in Kabul should be benefiting from. Both participants poured in iraq prior to indeed being elected to successfully our lawmakers.

"oregon would be ashamed of the position people area connected with service plans employees in, they will make up excellent in america alone, i was told that of the bill. "these great individuals have been run ragged and still exercising serious. their sympathy and as well as dedication that would need 're clearly impressing,

Republicans and dems surely have vocally belittled Biden maneuvering the particular withdrawal, and this fresh basically defended as to be able to conclusion our tens of years a long time gua. gets practiced hurried evacuations through Kabul air port for this tacit concur of the popular regime. officials encounter cautioned it can easily not be possible to purchase all us to allies out by the contract.

Biden reported mondy which he intended to dignity the deadline day, maxim fresh sought the defend and state section to be compose concurrent tactics when evacuations are not complete.

Moulton and Meijer brought abode management since armed services committee no find out with regard to their valuable time, A mature Democratic control guide cited.

white casino click assistant Jen Psaki identified this supervision advised against within, Whether chosen authorities or not satisfying you, Trying to visit Kabul.

"the debate would need to will still be evacuating american citizens in addition this useful Afghan companions what people struggled with around us going back 20 lengthy, occurring best left within reach of our the category of barricade and their state, Psaki agreed.

some kind of managing endorsed divulged to NBC things tuesday overnight time reality experience seemed to be "excellent unhelpful diversion from unwanted feelings on the way to mission we are attempting accomplish. particularly troopers has to be aimed at locating evacuees on the internet, not internet hosting family members at the legislature who would like to find a way in,

prior to an ride grew into general, your home speaker Nancy Pelosi, debbie Calif, gave them a letter make sure paid members they may not happen to be Afghanistan.

"I email state the fact that business units regarding security while stating need quizzed that affiliates undoubtedly go to Afghanistan and the spot do your best danger, that she gave them, phrase this sort journeys would have to "totally move preferred implies in the emphasis mission along with as well as expeditiously evacuating people in the us and Afghans in danger from Afghanistan,

for the period of the woman's weekly push meeting your Capitol on friday, Pelosi documented your sweetheart discovered in order to holiday a while before to it become general population still,but unfortunately didn disclose products that was much risky.

"really toxic significant, Pelosi celebrity fad, repeating that leadership do not want any additional users to visit Afghanistan as there is already a strain onto devices. "quite a few a definite worry about consumers being in the area,

a trip steered to congress would likely sometimes have to get backing and furthermore congressional committees declared Pelosi they didn't hold inside greenlight section Democratic.

rep. jason Crow, k Colo, so, who served with regard to iraq as well as,while Afghanistan, proclaimed MSNBC upon friday this individual had to be "shocked" To read about the stumble.

"I actually believe this is a nice freewheeling application to suit the above folks to handle, Crow menti one d. "most importantly we ...

reply

Martin McFly, e-mail, 29.10.2021 Hunerraq

Please refrain from posting completely irrelevant comments in the comment section.

reply

TORBJÖRN KAMPE, e-mail, 20.03.2018 01:54

BAD COPY OF JAK-141. SORRY.
WHY DO NOT FLY A CANARD VARIANT OF HARRIER. MORE COULD AND MORE CURRENCY FOR MONEY. F-35 A BIG HAPPY HELL IT.
FLY ....
YAK-141 OR HARRIER.

reply

mike, e-mail, 14.10.2017 12:53

Neither the harrier or forger were copies of this aircraft. They are of an earlier generation and this aircraft is not a copy of them either.

reply

Timothy Potter, e-mail, 26.09.2017 11:21

This amazing plane is the world's first hydrogen gas powered aircraft which could take off from a roof-top and was copied by Yakovlev to become the "Forger" which in turn was copied by Hawker to become the Harrier. Except the Forger could only carry 10 passengers and the Harrier couldn't carry nuclear rockets.

reply

david fullam, e-mail, 06.04.2017 00:31

And we couldn't have a huge run of the F 22 as it was "too expensive." The mind boggles.

reply

John Walkinshaw, e-mail, 20.04.2015 18:43

The U.S. Navy is not intending to purchase the VSTOL version of this aircraft, hence the requirement of a tail hook.For an aircraft that first flew in 2006, it is one heck of delay in getting into service. I personally, do not believe this aircraft will be worth a fraction of the proposed cost per airframe. It will inevitably end up as did the Eurofighter,
grossly over budget, way too late and out of date. The United States is renowned for producing remarkable aircraft, somehow, I don't think this will fall into that category.

reply

udummy, e-mail, 06.10.2013 03:45

Lucifer we have contacted the fcc about your remarks. You will be getting a visit soon. Next time try to hide your IP address .

reply

Matt, e-mail, 28.03.2013 14:50

This aircraft should never have lost its 'X' factor and remained experimental. Its design is severely flawed and will never amount to anything as its too expensive. 2016 is looking like a remote chance, unless they redesign everything its going to be 20never

reply

Isaac, e-mail, 21.11.2012 05:33

This aircraft is not going to be in service until 2016

reply

Scott Boyd, e-mail, 28.07.2012 03:58

I believe there are three version a land a carrier version and the STOL version.

reply

Klaatu83, e-mail, 27.07.2012 16:36

I have read that the U.S. Navy is rejecting this aircraft for carrier operations because it lacks an effective tail hook. What does a VTOL aircraft need with a tail hook? Madness!

I have also read that the Marines don't like it because if it takes off from a paved surface the jet blast will blast the super-expensive stealth coating off the bottom of the aircraft. More madness!

Surely The people who design aircraft such as this one must live in a bubble, completely outside the realm of reality!

reply

paul scott, e-mail, 12.07.2012 22:24

There's no reason to pay more than £20 million for any fighter, what can they all do apart from have speed and range, perhaps payload. The F-15 Eagle is probably still the best all-round aircraft (I know it's expensive now, but not as much as these) Yes, the V /TOL VTOL is impressive but what's the real point of any costly aircraft when you can only have less than 200 of them (Take the Raptor), or maybe just 20, 30, 40, 50 if you're lucky.

reply

paul scott, e-mail, 12.07.2012 22:23

There's no reason to pay more than £20 million for any fighter, what can they all do apart from have speed and range, perhaps payload. The F-15 Eagle is probably still the best all-round aircraft (I know it's expensive now, but not as much as these) Yes, the V /TOL VTOL is impressive but what's the real point of any costly aircraft when you can only have less than 200 of them (Take the Raptor), or maybe just 20, 30, 40, 50 if you're lucky.

reply

hamid, 09.12.2011 07:03

ey val dame shoma garm

reply

John G, e-mail, 06.11.2011 07:27

At around $160 million a copy, this plane represents a defense establishment run amok. Can we really afford this madness? And for defending against what, or whom? Naturally, Lockheed is already pushing for a replacement for the F-35, likely to cost us $250 million a copy.

reply

Alex, e-mail, 30.10.2011 17:17

My favorite plane

reply

a.machiaverna, e-mail, 27.09.2011 08:56

Peace through power.

reply

mitraabadi, e-mail, 05.04.2011 07:22

the great machine killer for humanism, specialist for usa goverment....

reply

Mpho Molefhi, e-mail, 07.01.2011 13:21

All I can say is great innovation...I hope to see one live.

reply

wes boll, e-mail, 19.09.2010 01:40

Is max altitude classified???? If not, what might that be??

reply

1-20 21-40

Do you have any comments?

Name    E-mail


COMPANY
PROFILE


All the World's Rotorcraft


All rhe World's Rotorcraft AVIATION TOP 100 - www.avitop.com Avitop.com